Monday, 12 October 2015

Theme 5: Reflections after the Lectures



This week we had to attend to two lectures instead of one lecture and one seminar. The theme of the week was the design research and the prototype and the empirical data. We read  the papers “Turn Your Mobile Into the Ball: Rendering Live Football Game Using Vibration” , “Finding design qualities in a tangible programming space” and “Differentiated Driving Range”.

At the first lecture with Haibo Li, we talked about the five steps from having an idea to realize that idea.
1. How to come up with an idea: the definition of the problem is more important than the solution of the problem. We have to define a problem several times in order to find out which the real problem is. Then the solution of that problem it will be easier to be found, the solution of the initial problem. Haibo gave the example of the bear that hunting two people and how the solution to that could be found by define again the problem.
2. How to filter an idea: technical evaluation of our ideas helps us pick the strongest one. As human we see the world we want to see. We see the world from our point of view. By using math we can understand things better in a different dimension.
3. How to validate an idea: in this step we are trying to proof the concept of our idea.
4. How can evaluate: the main part of evaluation is the usability. Usability consists of three parts; effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction. Some ways to evaluate an experiment are the ANOVA technique and the prototypes.
5. How to communicate your idea: this is the most important part in which we have to present our idea to the world. Make clear what our idea is about and present it with the most effective and efficient way.

The second lecture was more informative than the first one. However, the structure of it was a bit confusing, since the subject of the discussion was continuously changing. We talked about research, prototypes, empirical data and design. The main purpose of the research is to gain knowledge. Prototypes doesn’t have to be the solution of the problem, it’s a way that helps giving answers to the research question. We use design to create the right prototype. 

Empirical data is part of the process of research. In other words, we have to present our project to people and talk to them, get feedback, analyze the issues and make developments to our project, and then go back again to people. This is a back and forth procedure with which we gather empirical data. That is to say empirical data are the reality. A method to gather empirical data are the interviews. It’s important that after the interviews the data are analyzed otherwise we do not make new knowledge through them. Interviews are not qualitative method if the data are not analyzed.

We spent most of the time trying to explain what design is. As the lecturer said, this is a hard question that he could not answer simple. It’s a question that even him it not sure if he knows the answer. We said that design is a different point of view. It’s a way to reconfigure what is out there in the world, to reconfigure research question and reality into something else. Design is all the steps between the idea and the realization of prototype. It’s a different way from the traditional ones to explore a concept or a scenario. Also, during design a lot of professions are working together in order to help each other understand all the constructors of the problem.

In my opinion it would been better to have a seminar this week, since the seminar always helped me understand even more the subject of each week. In the seminar we could have discussed more about design, since this part is still not so clear to me.

6 comments:

  1. Hi,

    Your reflection gave me a new perspective on what was said during the first lecture. I had a hard time understanding my own notes on the difference between validating and evaluating an idea. At first I interpreted the ANOVA technique to be a part of validating an idea. So your reflection helped me understand the difference between these strategies better.

    Interesting reflection. I think that you have a great structure of your reflection, especially where you summarize what you have learnt from the first lecture!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your blog posts really show that you put a lot of effort into this week and worked on understanding the topics in-depth. The structure of the text, particularly the first lecture, really helps to frame the idea process. Moreover, you really succeed in bringing me closer to the subject of our second lecture, explaining the content in a very understandable manner while pouring in your own thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like to read your reflection because I can learn many new idea from your reflection. Besides the precise summary of what Haibo Li taught in lecture 1,you did a excellent analyzing on lecture 2.As for prototypes,I agree that prototype is used for gaining knowledge,it doesn't need to be a solution.What I learned most from your reflection is the explanation of "Empirical data".Well done

    ReplyDelete

  4. I am really I by how detail you are in this blogpost, it is really interesting for me how meticulous you are in providing every minute detail was there. Great job! Your blogpost seems more structure and content-rich than either of those lectures. I gotta admit that I learnt more from reading your reflection than form either of those lectures.
    I agree with about prototypes, and they are not meant to provide a solution to a problem. However, I personally think that if you don’t wanna solve a problem or make something better, why bother creating a prototype in the first place. In spite of that, I think your view on prototype is the common/accepted notion regrading the matter.

    I also agree if you don’t analyze the data form an interview you sort of defeat the purpose of a research project altogether.I totally agree with you that a seminar for this theme would be really useful. I need to admit that I learn more during the seminars than either reading on my own or via attending a lecture.

    All in all, I liked your reflection!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi, for the first lecture, you divided it into five questions and gave a detail explaination for each question,which i think is clearly and make easy to follow. For what i enjoyed to read is the reflection of your second lecture's contents. Case the teacher's voice is to low and i have so many parts can not followed which makes me confused when i wrote my reflection. But through your post, i have complexed what i missed in the lecture and also let me to review what i learned from the course. Very useful and very good to read you post, thank you so much.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi, Nice reflection. It's nice to see you right down the 5 steps and explain a little bit for each, which makes your reflection very structured and clear, this is what I missed in my post, and I like that your divided your reflection into two sections, and for the second section, you summarized the unstructured lecture very well, which also point a lot of important concepts in the lecture, thank you very much for sharing.

    ReplyDelete